April 11, 2024

Behind the Numbers (Part 2): Lawmakers Miss an Opportunity to Make Florida's Tax Code Fairer

Introduction

Each year, during the regular legislative session, state lawmakers pass an omnibus tax bill — commonly known as the Legislature’s “tax package” —  that offers an opportunity to make temporary or permanent changes to the state’s tax code.[1] This year’s tax package, House Bill (HB) 7073, would cost $827 million in one-time (or non-recurring) tax changes, including costs incurred (about $405 million) after FY 2024-25, plus $87 million in recurring expenses.

In this second installment of Florida Policy Institute (FPI's) three-part blog series, “Behind the Numbers: What Floridians Should Know About the State Tax System in FY 2024-25,” FPI provides a summary of missed opportunities in the tax package that would have made the tax code fairer. Part 1 provided an overview of the state’s current tax structure, and Part 3 recaps nine key provisions in the Legislature's tax proposal.

Tax Package Offers No Permanent, Long-Term Tax Relief to Floridians Who Need it Most

Considering that a ranking of state tax systems found Florida’s tax structure the most regressive in the country — this is explained more in Part 2 of FPI's “Behind the Numbers” series — it is important to consider whether tax legislation proposed by the Legislature seeks to close corporate income tax (CIT) loopholes, offer tax credits to families with low-to moderate income, and/or implement circuit breakers. 

As discussed below, neither the House nor the Senate included provisions to close CIT loopholes in their budget recommendations. While members of the Florida House had an opportunity to adopt an amendment to include combined reporting in the tax package, they ultimately voted against it. (Implementing combined reporting would have ensured that large multistate corporations are paying taxes in Florida.) Furthermore, HB 7073 does not include new permanent tax relief measures that would have  addressed Florida’s regressive sales tax burden and helped households with low to moderate income. Through the tax package, legislators had a chance to commission a study that would assess the impact of the Working Floridians Tax Rebate Program. Unfortunately, House members voted against it.

Concerning circuit breaker programs (i.e., programs that protect families from property tax “overload” much like how traditional circuit breakers protect against electrical overload), the tax package — if enacted — will extend from three to five years the amount of time a homeowner has to repair or rebuild their home after a misfortune or calamity, and maintain their homestead exemption. Relatedly, HB 7073 appropriates $200,000 to reimburse “fiscally constrained” rural counties that were required to refund property taxes to taxpayers whose residential property was rendered uninhabitable by Hurricane Idalia in 2023.[2]

While members of the Florida House had an opportunity to adopt an amendment to include combined reporting in the tax package, they ultimately voted against it. (Implementing combined reporting would have ensured that large multi-state corporations are paying taxes in Florida.)

Although the aforementioned property tax relief measures — and the insurance premium tax changes discussed in Part 3 of "Behind the Numbers" — help homeowners, these efforts are limited, since they would not help the 33 percent of Floridians who do not own property. Ultimately, given that the tax package does not close corporate income tax loopholes or offer permanent and targeted tax relief to households with low to moderate income, Florida’s tax code will remain the most regressive in the country for FY 2024-2025.

 

Notes

[1] While the omnibus tax package contains temporary and permanent tax changes for the upcoming fiscal year(s), policymakers may also submit standalone bills that make changes to specific tax issues, which could become part of the final tax package.

[2] The Legislature also amended parts of the Live Local Act and clarified that documentary stamp taxes only apply to the principal limit amount and not the entire mortgage obligation amount when someone borrows money based on their home’s equity (i.e., a reverse mortgage).

Downloadable Resources

There are no attachments currently.
No items found.