May 13, 2026

H.R. 1’s Expanded Work-Reporting Requirements for SNAP Participants Hurt Floridians and the Economy

H.R. 1, the federal budget reconciliation bill passed by Congress in July 2025, cut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by $187 billion. One of these cuts expands the categories of people who will only be able to receive food assistance for three months in a three-year period if they do not meet a mandatory 20-hour-per-week work-reporting requirement. This cut extends work-reporting requirements related to the three-month time limit to older participants up to age 65, people experiencing homelessness, parents of children at least 14 years old, veterans, and former foster youth.

Research shows that, instead of increasing employment, work requirements do little more than cause people in need to lose essential benefits due to circumstances beyond their control. This is because significant barriers often affect SNAP participants’ ability to satisfy work requirements. Studies suggest that, even though SNAP participants subject to work-reporting requirements may be doing their best to comply, many lose benefits due to paperwork or because they have fluctuating work schedules that are beyond their control. Additional reasons include poor transportation options, multiple unaddressed employment barriers, and, for some, higher rates of mental and physical impairments that make getting and keeping a job difficult. When people lose benefits, they are not only more likely to go hungry — they are also forced deeper into poverty. Particularly affected are participants of color, who face workforce discrimination and higher unemployment rates than Florida’s general population, which makes it harder to find steady employment to meet work requirements. 

Research shows that, instead of increasing employment, work requirements do little more than cause people in need to lose essential benefits due to circumstances beyond their control.

Under H.R. 1’s new restrictions, DCF estimates that roughly 181,217  additional Floridians[1] are now subject to the expanded work requirements. (See Table 1.)

Although the benefits of every participant subject to SNAP time limits in the state are at risk from work-reporting requirements, many participants falling within these new categories of affected Floridians already face significant barriers to finding stable employment.

Florida has one of the highest shares of seniors in the country. Many rely on SNAP to buy groceries that they cannot otherwise afford on a fixed income: approximately 576,000 SNAP households in Florida have income from Social Security. For seniors participating in SNAP, food assistance helps prevent Alzheimer’s and dementia as well as diseases like diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and osteoporosis. In addition, as many people age, health issues that affect their ability to work begin to increase. By the time that an adult with low income is aged 50-54, almost half have a health-related barrier to being able to work.

Florida also has one of the largest numbers of veterans experiencing homelessness in the country, as well as one of the highest rates of people who are experiencing homelessness during the winter, two categories of participants (i.e., veterans and people who are homeless) singled out by H.R.1 under the new expansion of SNAP work-reporting requirements. People who are homeless face unique barriers to employment that many others do not, such as the lack of a fixed address, identification, work clothes, laundry facilities, and showers, as well as poor credit scores. Penalizing SNAP participants for being unable to find 80-hour-a-month jobs by taking away food assistance will only make it more likely that they will be forced to prioritize the purchase of food over saving for professional clothes, housing, and other necessities that are an important bridge to finding jobs.

Penalizing SNAP participants for being unable to find 80-hour-a-month jobs by taking away food assistance will only make it more likely that they will be forced to prioritize the purchase of food over saving for professional clothes, housing, and other necessities that are an important bridge to finding jobs.

Similarly, imposing work-reporting requirements on former foster youth, who already experience high rates of homelessness and food insecurity, interferes with their long-term ability to get the education they need to lead successful lives. This is especially a risk for Floridians: only 68 percent of youth who age out of foster care in Florida have a high school diploma or GED, less than the national average and the average in Alabama, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina,  and West Virginia, among other states. To transition into self-sufficiency, former foster youth need a gateway to services that meet their basic needs, including a good education — not roadblocks that compound the disadvantages they may already face. Even DCF cautions that getting a job should not be a priority over education or other needs of foster youth transitioning to adulthood. 

Some parents who are now subject to H.R. 1’s SNAP work requirements if their child is at least 14 years old will be forced to take jobs that force them to leave children at home alone all day for the first time. Although many children who have turned 14 can take care of themselves, some may be too immature to make responsible decisions if left alone for extended periods of time, especially if they have a history of behavioral issues or refusing to follow rules. Others may live in high-crime areas and need the presence of an adult to stay or feel safe. Although Florida law does not specify the exact age at which a child can be left alone, state officials recognize that deciding when it is appropriate to leave a child alone requires that parents make a holistic evaluation of their child’s maturity and circumstances. Congress has already made this decision for SNAP participants with young teens without parental input or consideration of the unique needs of individually affected children. More than 15 percent of households with children participating in SNAP in Florida have only one adult in the family. Many of those participants will be caught in a double bind between leaving their children unattended and complying with the new work-reporting requirements to maintain SNAP eligibility or staying home to supervise their children and giving up the food assistance they need.

At the same time, Florida’s state and local economies also benefit from the influx of assistance spent at area stores and farmers markets — every dollar that a SNAP participant spends in Florida generates up to $1.80 in economic activity.

Contrary to the SNAP cuts in H.R. 1, ensuring access to food assistance fosters healthy Floridians and healthy communities. For individual Floridians, access to SNAP lowers health care costs and improves educational performance, short and long term health, and overall well-being. At the same time, Florida’s state and local economies also benefit from the influx of assistance spent at area stores and farmers markets — every dollar that a SNAP participant spends in Florida generates up to $1.80 in economic activity. This is an enormous boost for the thousands of small businesses in Florida that accept SNAP, as well as farmers in the state who are rebounding from crop loss due to record low temperatures and rainfall deficits.

Imposing work requirements on SNAP participants who are already in difficult situations is counterintuitive to promoting employment; instead, it is harmful to participants’ well-being and to the local economies where Floridians spend SNAP benefits.

Notes

[1] This estimate only reflects the number of current SNAP participants affected by H.R. 1’s expanded work requirements at the time that H.R. 1 was enacted. It does not include the additional people in the state who have been or will be affected by H.R. 1’s expanded work reporting requirements in the future.

Downloadable Resources

There are no attachments currently.
No items found.