April 22, 2025

Florida Budget Proposals in Brief (FY 2025-26): Education

This post is part of the “Florida Budget Proposals in Brief” blog series, where FPI highlights some of the key components of the House and Senate budget proposals — where they align, how they differ, and what it means for Floridians, communities, and the state economy. The difference between the House and Senate proposals is $4.4 billion, the largest difference between the chambers over the past 10 fiscal years. Consequently, policymakers will have to negotiate significant differences as they continue to agree upon a final budget. The proposals also differ from the governor’s $115.6 billion recommended budget for FY 2025-2026, with the Florida House advancing a $113 billion plan and the Senate proceeding with a $117.4 billion proposal.

The blog post below focuses on the proposed education budgets.

K-12 Funding and Vouchers

The proposed total funding for K-12 education is $30.9 billion in the House bill and $31.7 billion in the Senate, a difference of $814.8 million.  Both proposals are lower than the total education funding in the current fiscal year of $31.9 billion. The majority of education funding is allocated for K-12 funding. The Florida Education Finance Program (FEFP), which constitutes most K-12 funding would be increased over the current year’s allocation of $15.5 billion in both the House and Senate proposals at $15.7 billion and $16 billion respectively.  The Base Student Allocation, the most flexible spending category in the FEFP, also would increase in the House and Senate versions of the bill to $5,381 in the House and $5,398 in the Senate.

While increases for education overall are proposed in both chambers, the House budget proposes a decrease of $252.3 million in the Public Schools category, where the Senate version proposes an increase of $284.8 million.  These changes are minor and do not represent the magnitude of investment needed to fully fund public education. 

In 2023, Florida expanded eligibility for public school vouchers to all students regardless of income for the Family Empowerment Scholarship for Education Options (FES-EO) and the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship.  Annual enrollment caps were increased for students with disabilities in the Family Empowerment Scholarship for students with Unique Abilities for the same year. Vouchers continue to place great pressure on public schools as the funds are taken from public education funding and diverted to private schools and homeschooling. In the current school year, $3.2 billion are being diverted from public schools through the Family Empowerment Scholarships for 380,939 FES students. The House proposal increases the FES allocation by $805.9 million and the Senate proposal increases voucher funding by $823.3 million within the FEFP. The increase in the projected number of voucher students means that there is an increase in the State-Funded Discretionary Supplement (SFDS) which uses state funds to offset the loss of local non-voted discretionary millage that otherwise is part of the per pupil funding for traditional public and charter school students, an increase of $273.3 million in the House version.  The Senate version proposes to eliminate the SFDS. The Senate version also proposes to add $50 million[1] in voucher funding outside the FEFP in a line item for the Educational Enrollment Stabilization Program. This non-recurring funding was introduced in the back of the bill in 2023[2] and again appropriated in the back of the bill in 2024[3]. The House proposes to eliminate the EESP[4]. Including the EESP funds, the Senate proposes $4.1 billion in the FES and the EESP for vouchers. 

The amount of funding discussed above is only part of the voucher funding. The Florida Tax Credit scholarship for private schools and the Personalized Education Program for homeschooled students is authorized for an additional $1.1 billion. The FTC and PEP funds are not allocated through the General Appropriations Act.

Teacher pay – the teacher pay allocations proposed by the House and the Senate both, in total, exceed the current $1.3 billion that maintains prior year increases and includes new funding for salary increases. The House proposes a total of $1.4 billion to maintain past years’ increases, and adds $101.7 million new funding for teacher salaries. The Senate proposes $1.5 billion, including $248.6 million in new funding. As proposed, this would add $54-$132 per month to Florida’s 156,787 teachers.

Both proposals do a disservice to Florida’s public school students and its teachers. Currently, Florida is ranked 42nd in per pupil spending and 50th in average teacher pay.  The House proposes to increase the Base Student Allocation by less than 1 percent and the Senate proposes to increase it by 1.5 percent. The current rate of inflation is 2.4 percent according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.  To honor commitments to increase teacher pay, absorb cuts to advance academic and technical programs, and to fund the increased voucher funding, the proposed increases are not sufficient. Clearly, greater investment is needed to ensure our public schools can thrive.

Early Learning  

Both the House and Senate propose to reduce funding to early learning overall, the House by 8.1 percent and the Senate by 2.6 percent. One of the major components of state-funded early learning, School Readiness, is proposed to be cut by 10.2 percent by the House, and a less severe cut of 3.5 percent by the Senate. Both the House and Senate propose cuts of less than one percent for the other major early learning initiative, Voluntary Prekindergarten (VPK). Both proposals to leave the VPK base student allocation for the school year and summer programs is unchanged from current year funding of $3,029  and $2,586. While there are projected reductions in the enrollment for these programs due to falling birthrates, the proposed budget has missed an important opportunity to increase per pupil expenditures.  These per pupil expenditures would help attract and retain qualified teaching staff and also improve the ratios and sustainability of these two programs. Two bills that would expand VPK to an eight hour day, HB 191/ SB 70, have not been heard in committee in either chamber — a change that would greatly benefit Florida’s working families.

Notes

[1] Line 90A

[2] Section 54

[3] Sections 73 and 74

[4] Sections 52 and 53

Downloadable Resources

There are no attachments currently.
No items found.