July 9, 2026

FPI Comments on Proposed Regulation 6.001(10), General Admissions

The comments below were submitted electronically to the Board of Governors on July 9 2026.

On behalf of Florida Policy Institute, I am relaying my concerns about the above-referenced proposed regulation, which would require students to demonstrate that they are “lawfully present” for initial enrollment in Florida universities.

Creation of unnecessary barriers

Students at Florida's public universities, especially those in dual-enrollment programs, may enroll as young as 16. Because minors in the program may not have access to or the ability to obtain documentation of their “lawfully present” status, this regulation would create a discriminatory policy. Yet Florida's Constitution, Article IX, Section 1(a), states that "It is, therefore, a paramount duty of the state to make adequate provision for the education of all children residing within its borders." Similarly, Article IX Section 7(a) states that the State University System (SUS)’s purpose is “to achieve excellence through teaching students, advancing research and providing public service for the benefit of Florida’s citizens, their communities and economies.”

Moreover, because “lawfully present” is not defined and does not reference any specific state or federal law that does so, a broad swath of immigrants may be subject to this proposed enrollment ban, causing even wider harm.

Undermines legislative intent

The proposed regulation is inconsistent with the legislative intent expressed by the 2026 Florida Legislature. In the 2026 Legislative Session, the Legislature rejected a provision in HB 1279 that would have prevented undocumented students from attending Florida's SUS. On the Senate floor, policymakers removed the language affecting undocumented students entirely before the broader bill passed (see Chapter 2026-59). Because regulations are meant to enforce existing policy, not create new laws, the Board of Governors is attempting the latter with this regulation.

Overlooked fiscal impact

The Board of Governors has offered no financial estimate of how much this proposed regulation could cost universities and the larger state economy.

First, the proposed regulation imposes an uncompensated administrative burden on the SUS, which would now be responsible for establishing local policies and systems to verify that students are "lawfully present," a vague term not defined in the proposed regulation.

Second, there is likely to be a steep reduction in university tuition and fee revenue as countless students would be blocked from enrolling. Moreover, the regulation specifies that this ban would apply to state universities that did not admit all “academically qualified applicants, except for cases in which applicants were rejected for non-academic reasons.” Why this stipulation is important is unclear, as are any fiscal implications.

Privacy concerns

Personally identifiable education data is protected under the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. § 1232g, and 34 C.F.R. Part 99, which supersede the proposed regulation. Because FERPA prohibits the disclosure of personally identifiable information without the student's consent, this regulation will require Florida's universities to substantiate the student's "lawfully present" status. These data would subsequently be auditable, thereby violating FERPA. It also places an undue administrative burden on students.

For these reasons, the proposed regulation should not be adopted.

Downloadable Resources

There are no attachments currently.
No items found.